|
SELF-REPRESENTING: MY EXPERIENCE
Self representation is not common in the courts and the thought
of it would strike fear into the heart of most people if it were suggested to them.
The reality is, although frightening it can produce a faster response to the immediate problem.
Once the initial appearance has been made, it will get easier as you become more confident and the truth will always emerge.
Also the costs involved will be minimal compared to using a solicitor...
"Supersub" has offered her story and tips for combating the
fears of self representation, maybe it will help to eliminate the need for a solicitor in the family courts...
My ex is "Alan". now aged 42.
Our daughter,
"Emily", born in 1999 with velocardiofacial syndrome, i.e. physical and intellectual developmental delays, speech problems
(2 ops so far), hole in the heart (repaired), hearing loss and a few other issues.
The background: Alan and I
lived together in London for a year. We were never married. He has dual US/British nationality and after we split he
chose to go back to the US because that's where the well-paid jobs are in his field.
Our history since the split
wasn't good. He asked me to have an abortion, then wanted the baby adopted, then wanted her handed over to him at birth
to bring up alone. I had a nervous breakdown from stress at eight months pregnant and spent three weeks in a psychiatric
clinic, just making it out in time for the birth - luckily I've made a good recovery and am now only slightly bonkers.
When Emily was six months old Alan applied for contact and PR orders, although I'd continually offered him contact
which he'd refused. His application stated I might "deny paternity" - unlikely as I was then suing him for child support
in the US!
Eventually, after interviews and a Cafcass report, we negotiated a Consent Order through his solicitor.
I had a lawyer briefly but it cost too much to carry on. Alan finally saw his daughter for the first time on her
second birthday. Since then he has visited three to four times a year for a week at a time, i.e. his maximum annual
leave allowance. I've avoided him as much as I could and got someone else to do the handovers where possible, just to
avoid "scenes".
I had intended all along to return to Australia with my sons and their father, my ex-husband; we
lived there for five years and both boys were born there. We came over in 1990 intending to stay five years but split
up in the meantime and got "stuck" because of the boys' education. They were 11 and 13 when their half-sister was born.
Last June my younger son left school and my older boy was already working in Sydney (he's now been settled there
for almost 2 years). The time was ripe to ask Emily's dad's consent to the move, bearing in mind that as he lived on
a third continent, all he could realistically do was make things difficult for me. He did. He raised every objection
he and his lawyer could think of and demanded dozens of conditions, some very petty and insulting ("you must make sure
Emily has a large, safe garden to play in"). We negotiated backwards and forwards for months, partly through his £300-an-hour
lawyer, partly alone; eventually I gave him a deadline after which I would go to court. But he carried on demanding
things he knew I wouldn't agree to, possibly hoping I'd give up.
Finally, having consulted a solicitor on an hourly basis
(about 3 hours total), I visited the Principal Registry of the Family Division in Holborn, where our Consent Order had
been lodged, to issue a Form C2 asking for variation of the consent order and leave to remove my daughter from the jurisdiction
of England and Wales.
The initial (conciliation) hearing was in March. I had my close friend, who is my daughter's
godmother, with me as a McKenzie Friend (see the FNF website for explanation of what this is) As FNF advises, I'd written
to the Clerk of the Court a few weeks early letting them know I would have a MK with me, as it has been known for judges
to refuse to allow them in the family court, although they shouldn't. The FNF website also provides a letter proforma
for this.
The Principal Registry, although technically part of the Royal Courts of Justice in the Strand, is a separate,
modern office block in High Holborn. We checked the website early that morning to see which judge would be hearing the
case and which court it would be in, then met in the waiting room. First, you check in with the receptionist on your
floor and tell them you have no legal representation (just so they know not to wait for a lawyer); there were a couple
of waiting rooms and I could see Alan in one of them, so my friend and I went into the other one. The clerk of the
court came to call us at exactly the time we were meant to go in, although I have heard that there can be very long
delays. At that point I realised that Alan didn't have a solicitor or anyone else with him.
The courtroom was large
and well-lit with rows of benches and a raised dais at the front, where the (female) Deputy District Judge was already
sitting with a female welfare worker to one side; the clerk sat down on the judge's other side and started typing on
his computer. We filed into the front row, with me in the middle, and the judge welcomed us, established which was me,
and asked who my friend was. I introduced her and asked if it was all right for her to be there. The judge asked her
how she saw her role and my friend said - to listen, make notes and advise me quietly, but not to address the court
- exactly what an MK's role should be.
With Alan being American, he'd clearly never heard of Mks and the judge
outlined to him what it is and asked if he had any objection. He asked if it was normal and she said yes. He shrugged
his shoulders, upon which the judge asked my friend if she agreed to keep everything she heard in court confidential.
My friend said yes.
For the record, the judge was "firm but fair" and seemed to me to be totally impartial. She
was obviously Jewish and although I'm C of E, Alan is Jewish and one of our differences was about religion, she didn't
appear to favour him on this at all; and although she was female she didn't appear to be on my side in any way.
The
welfare officer was very supportive to us all, constantly making eye-contact and smiling. The judge went through our
differences and noted that they were actually quite small, although they had beforehand seemed massive to us; in essentials,
she stressed, we were actually not that far apart. She said she believed we could come to an agreement that day without
having to proceed to a full trial or expensive mediation, and she said she intended to send us out to have a discussion
in the waiting area, then call us back at the end of her listings.
That's what happened. Alan and I had a three-way discussion
with my friend, who ended up doing a fantastic job as go-between, criticising me when she thought I was being unreasonable
and doing the same thing to him; and when the judge called us all back, we had reached an agreement. The judge then
wrote down everything we had agreed, gave me leave to remove my daughter and wished us both well.
What's more,
since then Alan and I have been swapping constructive and even friendly emails, which would have been unthinkable before
the court case. I know this won't be the same for everyone but I just wanted to stress that you can do it all without
a lawyer and, in fact, it can be a much more satisfying experience, apart from the piles of money you're saving, because you
get to advocate for yourself and after all, it's only you that knows exactly how you are feeling and what you want.
Hints
and tips for representing yourself:
There isn't much space on the application form C1 or C2 to explain the circumstances,
but if you want, you can put in a separate statement expanding on why you're making the application and hand it in with
the form.
Make sure you serve the documents on the other side in good time, and with everything included. Do
it properly in other words, don't risk getting it wrong.
Don't forget to take lots of photocopies of the completed
forms for yourself, although the court should give you copies when you lodge the form. They did with me but apparently
they don't always.
If your ex has a lawyer, check with them first if they will accept service on their client's
behalf. If they do and you're going to the lawyer's office for service, get the lawyer or receptionist to initial one of
your copies.
You are allowed to serve by first class post but do leave plenty of time to allow for postal delays.
Phone after 2 days to check the lawyer has received it for your own peace of mind.
Rehearse out loud what you're
going to tell the court to support your application. Go through this with a friend if you like. Make notes to refer
to, but don't actually write a script as it will make a better impression if you speak directly to the judge.
Practise
breathing exercises beforehand. Ten deep breaths - inhale through your nose and exhale through your mouth (not too audibly!).
Buy
a new box file (WH Smith or Rymans) to take all your documents. If in doubt, take absolutely everything with you, but
make sure it is in either date order, or in order of importance. You don't want to be holding things up by faffing through
papers trying to find something.
If you like, stick a picture of your child inside the cover of the file, just
to focus you and remind you why you're there.
Speak clearly and make eye contact with the judge all the time
you're speaking. Be very aware of your body language towards your ex - it can say more about your attitude than your
words do.
Don't allow the ex or their lawyer to wind you up. Don't raise your voice. Stay cool, stay dignified. Don't
say "That's a *&$£ing lie", say "That really isn't the case."
|